Comparison

Storyly is built for stories. Digia covers the rest of the in-app layer too.

Digia vs Storyly: In-App Engagement

Storyly is a content experience platform built around stories, video feeds, swipe cards, and AI-personalized product discovery for mobile commerce. Digia Engage is a broader in-app engagement layer: nudges, widgets, surveys, native gamification, and video, alongside its own stories format. The scope difference is what decides which one fits.

Storyly homepage presenting its AI-powered content experience platform
Storyly's published AI-powered content experience platform, captured August 2026.

Storyly is a content experience platform for mobile commerce, covering stories, video feeds, swipe cards, canvas, and banners, personalized through the Amazon Personalize recommendation engine. Digia Engage is an in-app engagement layer covering nudges, widgets, surveys, native gamification, and video, alongside its own stories, built to render inside the customer engagement platform (CEP) you already run. This page compares the two on format breadth, architecture, and pricing, using each company's own published materials, plus a look at three of Storyly's other named competitors.

What this comparison found, in short

  • Storyly's published feature set centers on stories, video feeds, swipe cards, canvas, and banners, personalized through the Amazon Personalize recommendation engine. It does not publish native gamification mechanics such as scratch cards or spin-to-win.
  • Neither Storyly nor Digia publishes list pricing. InAppStory ($399–$999+/month) and StorifyMe (Growth from $400/month, Enterprise from $1,000/month) both publish tiered pricing; AppStorys also publishes partial pricing.
  • InAppStory's own published comparison against Storyly lists pop-ups, bottom sheets, toast and full-screen messages, in-app landing pages, and mini-games as available on InAppStory but not published on Storyly.

How this comparison was put together

Every claim about Storyly, InAppStory, StorifyMe, and AppStorys on this page traces to each company's own published pages, pricing pages, or, in InAppStory's case, its own published feature comparison against Storyly directly. Every claim about Digia traces to Digia's own published product pages. This is not a hands-on SDK integration test of any of the four platforms, and it is not billed as one.

Scope and limitations. Ratings and pricing figures are self-reported by each company or aggregated from public review platforms and have not been independently re-measured here. Where a row in the table below has no confirmed public figure for one side, it is marked "not published" rather than filled in with a guess.

Disclosure. Digia sells Digia Engage, which competes directly with Storyly on in-app engagement. This comparison was written and published by Digia. It is not independent, and it is not sponsored by or affiliated with Storyly, InAppStory, StorifyMe, or AppStorys. It differs in method from Digia's SDK-tested comparisons, such as the MoEngage comparison, which is based on a direct integration test rather than published materials alone.

Compiled by the Digia team. . Something out of date? Email info@digia.tech and we'll correct it.

To be clear: Storyly is a highly rated content platform, self-reporting a 4.7/5 rating across 260+ G2 reviews, multiple G2 leader badges, and named enterprise customers including Sephora, Turkish Airlines, and Coca-Cola. Its AI-driven personalization, powered by Amazon Personalize, and its shoppable-video depth for commerce brands are genuine differentiators. This page is about format breadth beyond stories, not a broad case against the platform.

Feature comparison across in-app content and engagement tools

A high-level market map based on each platform's published positioning and documentation, reviewed August 2026. Product packaging varies by plan and region.

Digia Engage, Storyly, InAppStory, StorifyMe, and AppStorys feature comparison, August 2026
Feature / CapabilityDigia EngageStorylyInAppStoryStorifyMeAppStorys
Best fit Mobile teams that already run a CEP and want a broader native in-app engagement layer Commerce and retail brands wanting AI-personalized, shoppable stories and content flows Teams that want one workspace covering stories, messages, banners, and mini-games Teams wanting the same stories/shorts engagement layer live on both their app and website India-first teams wanting a full no-code engagement suite without an Enterprise-only price tag
In-app format library Nudges, tooltips, bottom sheets, banners, widgets, stories, surveys, video, gamification Stories, video feeds, swipe cards, canvas, banners Stories, in-app messages (pop-ups, modals, bottom sheets, toast, full-screen, ScrollView), SMART banners, mini-games Stories, Shorts (vertical video), Snaps (UGC), Ads, plus an AI content assistant Stories, reels, PiP video, banners, floaters, widgets, coachmarks, spotlights, bottom sheets
Gamification Scratch cards, spin-to-win, streaks, milestones, badges, quizzes Not published as a native format Scratch cards, plus 12 pre-built mini-game mechanics Not published as a standalone format; interactivity built into stories (polls, quizzes, sliders) Scratch cards and quizzes
Architecture Renders inside the CEP you already run (CleverTap, MoEngage, WebEngage) Standalone content experience platform, personalization powered by Amazon Personalize Standalone managed communication layer, one dashboard for all formats Standalone SDK for both mobile app and website, same content reused across both Standalone no-code suite, also covers push, email, WhatsApp, and SMS
AI Natural-language segmentation, on-brand creative generation, pre-launch campaign review Contextual personalization via the Amazon Personalize recommendation engine Not a primary published capability AI content assistant for generating stories; personalization and segmentation at Enterprise tier AI-assisted campaign design inside its drag-and-drop editor
Pricing Custom quote Custom quote, not published Published tiers, roughly $399–$999+/month, MAU-based Published tiers, Growth from $400/month, Enterprise from $1,000/month, usage-based Custom quote, scoped to app size and selected features

Storyly vs InAppStory

Storyly and InAppStory both start from the same format: full-screen, swipeable stories with shoppable product cards. InAppStory maintains its own published feature-by-feature comparison against Storyly directly, which is the clearest source for this section. The gap shows up once the job moves past stories into banners, in-app messages, and mini-games.

The clearest differences, per InAppStory's own published table:

  • Shoppable stories: Both platforms publish shoppable stories, product tags, and checkout logic, with InAppStory additionally listing Full HD video support.
  • In-app messaging: InAppStory publishes pop-ups, modals, bottom sheets, toast messages, full-screen prompts, and in-app landing pages (ScrollView). Its own comparison lists these formats as not available on Storyly.
  • Gamification: InAppStory publishes scratch cards and 12 pre-built mini-game mechanics. Storyly does not publish gamification as a native format.
  • Where Digia differs: Digia organizes the same territory into five product lines (nudges, widgets, surveys, gamification, video) and adds AI-assisted segmentation and campaign review that neither Storyly nor InAppStory publish.
InAppStory homepage presenting its managed in-app communication layer
InAppStory's published in-app communication platform, captured August 2026.
Storyly versus InAppStory focused feature comparison
Feature / CapabilityStorylyInAppStory
App stories Available Available
Shoppable stories / video Available Available, including Full HD video
Pop-ups, modals, bottom sheets Not published Available
Mini-games Not published 12 pre-built mechanics
Best fit Commerce-led shoppable content Full in-app communication and campaign control

Choose Storyly if:

Commerce-led shoppable content and AI-personalized product discovery are the priority, and stories plus banners cover your use case.

Choose InAppStory if:

You need pop-ups, bottom sheets, full-screen messages, in-app landing pages, or mini-games alongside stories, from one dashboard.

Storyly vs StorifyMe

Storyly and StorifyMe are the two platforms here closest in original scope: both started as a stories tool and both publish shoppable content and analytics. The clearest difference is surface and monetization. StorifyMe explicitly targets both the open web and the mobile app with the same Stories and Shorts formats, plus a dedicated Ads product; Storyly's current positioning centers on mobile commerce specifically, with AI-driven personalization as its core differentiator.

Where the two diverge, based on each company's own published pages:

  • Surface: StorifyMe publishes Stories and Shorts for both websites and mobile apps from one SDK. Storyly's public positioning is built around mobile app and web stories for commerce specifically.
  • Monetization: StorifyMe publishes a dedicated Ads product for running ads between stories and shorts. Storyly does not publish an equivalent monetization product.
  • Personalization: Storyly's personalization runs on the Amazon Personalize recommendation engine. StorifyMe's AI, the StorifyMe Assistant, is scoped to generating story content, with personalization available as an Enterprise-tier feature.
  • Pricing: StorifyMe publishes tiered pricing from $400/month (Growth, 100,000 story/short views) to $1,000/month (Enterprise, unlimited). Storyly does not publish list pricing.
StorifyMe homepage presenting itself as the engagement layer for apps and websites
StorifyMe's published homepage, positioned as the engagement layer for apps and websites, captured August 2026.
Storyly versus StorifyMe focused feature comparison
Feature / CapabilityStorylyStorifyMe
Format library Stories, video feeds, swipe cards, canvas, banners Stories, Shorts, Snaps (UGC), Ads
Surface Mobile app and web, commerce-focused Mobile app and open web, same SDK
Monetization Not published as a native product Dedicated Ads product between stories/shorts
AI Amazon Personalize recommendation engine Content-generation assistant; personalization at Enterprise tier
Pricing Custom quote, not published Published tiers from $400/month

Choose Storyly if:

AI-driven personalization and commerce-specific shoppable formats matter more than a published starting price.

Choose StorifyMe if:

You want the same story format live on both your website and app, plus a starting price you can budget against without a sales call.

Storyly vs AppStorys

AppStorys is a broader no-code growth suite built around India-first pricing and support. Where Storyly's public feature set stays inside stories, video, and banners, AppStorys publishes a wider format list plus outbound channels (push, email, WhatsApp, SMS) that Storyly does not offer.

The scope difference, based on each company's own published pages:

  • Format breadth: AppStorys publishes stories, reels, PiP video, banners, floaters, widgets, coachmarks, spotlights, bottom sheets, scratch cards, quizzes, surveys, and CSAT feedback in one suite. Storyly's public list is narrower: stories, video feeds, swipe cards, canvas, and banners.
  • Outbound channels: AppStorys publishes push, email, WhatsApp, and SMS alongside its in-app formats. Storyly's public positioning stays in-app and on-web.
  • Gamification: AppStorys publishes scratch cards and quizzes as native mechanics. Storyly does not publish gamification as a native format.
  • Pricing philosophy: AppStorys quotes pricing scoped to app size and the specific features selected, positioned explicitly against Enterprise-only competitor tiers. Storyly does not publish pricing at all.
AppStorys homepage presenting its no-code in-app engagement suite
AppStorys' published in-app engagement suite, captured August 2026.
Storyly versus AppStorys focused feature comparison
Feature / CapabilityStorylyAppStorys
Format library Stories, video feeds, swipe cards, canvas, banners Stories, reels, PiP video, banners, floaters, widgets, coachmarks
Gamification Not published Scratch cards, quizzes
Outbound channels Not published as a core capability Push, email, WhatsApp, SMS
Pricing Custom quote, not published Custom quote, scoped to app size and features
Best fit AI-personalized commerce content Full no-code engagement suite, India-first support

Choose Storyly if:

Stories, shoppable video, and AI personalization are the core need, and outbound channels are handled elsewhere.

Choose AppStorys if:

You want stories plus gamification plus outbound push, email, and WhatsApp in one no-code suite, quoted to your app's size.

Where Digia and Storyly actually diverge

Architecture

Standalone platform vs. rendering layer

Storyly

Runs as its own content experience platform, with the Amazon Personalize recommendation engine handling personalization behind the scenes.

Digia

Native rendering layer inside the CEP you already have, reusing the segments and events you manage there instead of adding a separate personalization engine.

Source [1]: Storyly homepage
Format library

Format library

Storyly

Stories, video feeds, swipe cards, canvas, and banners, oriented around commerce and shoppable content.

Digia

Organizes the same territory into five product lines: nudges, widgets, surveys, gamification, and in-app video.

Source [1]: Storyly homepage
Gamification

Gamification is not a published format

Storyly

Storyly's public feature list does not include scratch cards, spin-to-win, or other native gamification mechanics.

Digia

Ships scratch cards, spin-to-win, streak tracking, milestone badges, and quizzes as native components.

Source [1]: Storyly homepage
AI

Where AI sits in the product

Storyly

AI lives inside personalization: the Amazon Personalize recommendation engine tailors content and product suggestions per shopper.

Digia

AI runs across three specific jobs: natural-language audience segmentation, on-brand creative generation, and an automated pre-launch review of every campaign.

Source [1]: Storyly homepage
Pricing

Neither publishes list pricing

Storyly

Storyly quotes pricing directly. No plan tiers or starting price are published on its site.

Digia

Also quotes per account, based on user volume, connected channels, and impression count.

Source [1]: Storyly homepage
Social proof

Enterprise customer base

Storyly

Publishes named enterprise customers including Sephora, Turkish Airlines, and Coca-Cola, plus multiple G2 leader badges and a self-reported 4.7/5 rating across 260+ reviews.

Digia

Does not publish an equivalent public G2 review count as of this review.

Source [10]: G2, Storyly comparison pages

Based on each company's published product and pricing pages, August 2026.

Digia vs Storyly, side by side

Capabilities compared as of August 2026, based on each company's published documentation and pricing pages. Both products change over time, so if something below is out of date, we'd genuinely like to know.

Digia Engage vs Storyly, feature-by-feature comparison for in-app engagement, August 2026
Dimension Storyly Digia Engage
Format library Stories, video feeds, swipe cards, canvas, banners Nudges, widgets, surveys, gamification, in-app video, plus stories
Gamification Not published as a native format Scratch cards, spin-to-win, streaks, milestones, quizzes
Personalization engine Amazon Personalize recommendation engine AI segmentation, creative generation, and pre-launch campaign review
Architecture Standalone content experience platform Renders inside the CEP you already run (CleverTap, MoEngage, WebEngage)
Pricing Custom quote, not published Custom quote based on user volume, connected channels, and impression count
G2 rating (self-reported) 4.7 / 5 across 260+ reviews Not independently listed on G2 as of this review
Compliance Not published on the homepage as of this review GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001

Choose based on your architecture, not just your feature list

Choose Digia if:

You already run CleverTap, MoEngage, or WebEngage and want the in-app layer to render inside that setup, reusing your existing segments and events. You also want gamification, surveys, and nudges alongside stories, plus AI handling audience segmentation, creative generation, and pre-launch campaign review as part of the platform.

Choose Storyly if:

Stories, shoppable video, and AI-personalized product discovery are the core need, you're a commerce or retail brand, and you don't need native gamification or a broader nudge/survey/widget library from the same platform.

Already on Storyly and evaluating a switch?

Because Digia is built to render inside your existing CEP rather than stand alone, teams typically keep their CleverTap, MoEngage, or WebEngage setup for outbound channels and evaluate Digia specifically against Storyly's content layer. That's a scoped, side-by-side evaluation rather than a full platform migration, and it's the fastest way to see which architecture actually fits your product.

Common questions

Is Digia a replacement for Storyly, or does it work alongside it?

Digia and Storyly compete for the same job: the in-app content and engagement layer. Digia is not built to run on top of Storyly, the way it's built to run on top of CleverTap, MoEngage, or WebEngage. Teams evaluating a switch are typically replacing Storyly's stories and content layer with Digia's, while keeping whatever CDP or CEP they already run for outbound channels.

What is the main architectural difference between Digia and Storyly?

Storyly operates as a standalone content experience platform with its own AI personalization engine, Amazon Personalize. Digia is built specifically to render inside the CEP integration you already run, reusing the segments and events you manage in CleverTap, MoEngage, or WebEngage instead of adding a second data and personalization layer.

Source [1]: Storyly homepage

Which platform is cheaper, Digia or Storyly?

Neither company publishes list pricing. Storyly and Digia both quote per account, so a direct dollar comparison depends on your specific usage, users, and features. For reference, other platforms in this comparison do publish starting prices: InAppStory from roughly $399/month, and StorifyMe from $400/month.

Source [3]: StorifyMe homepage

Does Storyly offer gamification like scratch cards or spin-to-win?

Not as a native, published format. Storyly's public feature list centers on stories, video feeds, swipe cards, canvas, and banners. InAppStory and AppStorys both publish scratch cards as a native mechanic, and Digia publishes scratch cards, spin-to-win, streaks, milestones, and quizzes.

Source [2]: InAppStory, "Storyly Alternative: When to Choose a Broader In-App Platform"

How was this comparison put together?

This comparison was compiled from Storyly's own published pages, InAppStory's own published Storyly vs InAppStory feature table, AppStorys' own published pricing and feature pages, and StorifyMe's own published homepage and pricing pages. This is not a hands-on SDK integration test of any of the four platforms, and it is not billed as one. Digia's other comparison pages, including the MoEngage comparison, are based on direct SDK testing, and that distinction is disclosed on each page.

What are the best Storyly alternatives for in-app engagement specifically?

Teams comparing Storyly typically also look at InAppStory, StorifyMe, AppStorys, Plotline, and Braze, though several of those are broader omnichannel platforms rather than dedicated stories tools. Digia is closer to this group in scope: a dedicated in-app engagement layer rather than a full outbound suite, so it's best compared on in-app format depth and architecture rather than on channel breadth.

Sources cited on this page

  1. Storyly homepage (current AI-powered content experience positioning, widget library, smart flows, personalization): storyly.io , accessed August 2026.
  2. InAppStory, "Storyly Alternative: When to Choose a Broader In-App Platform" (InAppStory's own published Storyly vs InAppStory feature-by-feature table): inappstory.com/compare/storyly-alternative , accessed August 2026.
  3. StorifyMe homepage ("the engagement layer for apps and websites" positioning, product list, customer metrics): storifyme.com , accessed August 2026.
  4. StorifyMe pricing page (published Growth and Enterprise tiers, usage-based (MAU/MPV) pricing): storifyme.com/pricing , accessed August 2026.
  5. AppStorys homepage (no-code in-app engagement suite, format list, CDP integration): appstorys.com , accessed August 2026.
  6. AppStorys, "AppStorys vs Plotline: Feature, Pricing & ROI Comparison" (AppStorys' own published pricing philosophy and India-first positioning): appstorys.com/blog-AppStorys-vs-Plotline-Comparison , accessed August 2026.
  7. Digia Engage homepage (Digia's own published product specs, AI features, and pricing philosophy): digia.tech , accessed August 2026.
  8. G2, Storyly comparison pages (self-reported 4.7 / 5 rating aggregate across 260+ reviews, Mid-Market segment): g2.com/compare/manychat-vs-storyly , accessed August 2026.

This comparison does not include a hands-on SDK integration test of Storyly, InAppStory, StorifyMe, or AppStorys. See How this comparison was put together above for scope and limitations.

Ready to see native in-app formats beyond stories?

Book a demo and we'll walk through gamification, widgets, surveys, and how Digia connects to CleverTap, MoEngage, or WebEngage without a new data layer.